@Article{PoelmanSPCMHSH:2021:AlVa,
author = "Poelman, Dieter R. and Schulz, Wolfgang and Pedeboy, Stephanie and
Campos, Leandro. Z. S. and Matsui, Michihiro and Hill, Dustin and
Saba, Marcelo Magalh{\~a}es Fares and Hunt, Hugh",
affiliation = "{Royal Meteorological Institute of Belgium} and {Austrian
Lightning Detection and Information System (ALDIS)} and
{M{'e}t{'e}orage} and {Campos Scientific Computing} and
{Franklin Japan Corporation} and {Scientific Lightning Solutions
LLC (SLS)} and {Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais (INPE)}
and {University of Witwatersrand}",
title = "Global ground strike point characteristics in negative downward
lightning flashes – Part 2: Algorithm validation",
journal = "Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences",
year = "2021",
volume = "21",
pages = "1921--1933",
month = "Jun",
abstract = "At present the lightning flash density is a key input parameter
for assessing the risk of occurrence of a lightning strike in a
particular region of interest. Since it is known that flashes tend
to have more than one ground termination point on average, the use
of ground strike point densities as opposed to flash densities is
more appropriate. Lightning location systems (LLSs) do not
directly provide ground strike point densities. However, ingesting
their observations into an algorithm that groups strokes into
respective ground strike points results in the sought-after
density value. The aim of this study is to assess the ability of
three distinct ground strike point algorithms to correctly
determine the observed ground-truth strike points. The output of
the algorithms is tested against a large set of ground-truth
observations taken from different regions around the world,
including Austria, Brazil, France, Spain, South Africa and the
United States of America. These observations are linked to the
observations made by a local LLS in order to retrieve the
necessary parameters of each lightning discharge, which serve as
input for the algorithms. Median values of the separation distance
between the first stroke in the flash and subsequent ground strike
points are found to vary between 1.3 and 2.75\ĝ¯km. It
follows that all three of the algorithms perform well, with
success rates of up to about 90\ĝ¯% to retrieve the correct
type of the strokes in the flash, i.e., whether the stroke creates
a new termination point or follows a pre-existing channel. The
most important factor that influences the algorithms' performance
is the accuracy by which the strokes are located by the LLS.
Additionally, it is shown that the strokes' peak current plays an
important role, whereby strokes with a larger absolute peak
current have a higher probability of being correctly classified
compared to the weaker strokes.",
doi = "10.5194/nhess-21-1921-2021",
url = "http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/nhess-21-1921-2021",
issn = "1684-9981",
language = "en",
targetfile = "poelman_global2.pdf",
urlaccessdate = "09 maio 2024"
}